Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Restaurant Pricing - Some "Food for Thought"


By Peter Maniscalco

My wife and I recently visited one of our favorite local restaurants (a "Bar & Grill" as it's called).  We've been loyal customers for several years.  It's a nice place, always busy with good food, service, atmosphere and, reasonable prices. Clientele is mixed (i.e. blue and white collar patrons)as the establishment is located in the suburbs but, not close in proximity to a major city either. Sounds like a great place so far, right?  Well, that was the case until about six months ago after we had some new priced "food for thought".

What happened?  Well, whether it was due to the change in economic conditions over the last few years or not, the Bar & Grill decided to make some changes.  The food is still good with same portion sizes and the atmosphere is still nice, however, the grill extended the length of the bar.  Okay, so they can now seat  several more customers at the bar.  I see the improvement. What we noticed even more was a complete change out of staff members.  And yes, as a result there has been a noticeable decline in the level of quality service in addition to (are you ready for this?), selective yet significant price increases in the menu!
Examples include a two dollar increase for a salad, a one to two dollar increase for a cocktail, and a one to two dollar increase for a dessert.  This all happened within a month or so of completing the bar "renovation".
Well, we all know commodity costs have increased in the last couple of years or so but did the Bar & Grill inadvertently "overlook", ignore, or just plain screw up their value proposition here?  The staff, according to what we understand from an inside "source", is much less costly compared to the prior staff.  All right, so now their variable costs have decreased.  But, the additional costs incurred were for the extended bar, a one-time fixed cost investment!  My "Food for Thought?"  The food/drink price increases are significant,  there is a decline in the level of quality customer service but quality of food and atmosphere are still solid. However, from what we've heard and observed, the level of business has dropped noticeably.

The key points missed here by the owner are that a value proposition contains more than just the price element; pricing is not solely just a function of costs; and to be successful one must take into consideration the target market/customer base.(i.e. segmentation)

Alternative solutions?  Sure.  Here are a few quick and obvious ones that the owner(s) could have taken.

  1. Bar & grill could have held its prices, for at least a little longer anyway.  Please don't let me as a customer think your price increases are simply a way to help you cover your sunk cost investment (i.e. extending the length of the bar).  Since there was an "overhaul" of the staff which reduced its variable costs, by holding its prices the Bar & Grill could probably still maintain its margins even in light of commodity cost increases.  Or, an option would have been to implement smaller and selective price increases, if the owners felt compelled to do so.  
  2. Bar & Grill could have implemented a less obvious price increase by "downsizing" the portion of its food and drinks, instead of the quite more noticeable price increases.  
  3. Instead of a mass overhaul of its staff, the owners could have taken a selective approach in terms of reducing its variable costs.  For example, the owners could review their payroll staff and re-balance their hours and schedules based on employee labor expense differences.   

Will we frequent this establishment as often?  Most likely not. I'm not sure where the value is now, since we(and other patrons I'm sure) observed quite noticeable price increases, an obvious decline in quality customer service and a feeling that the restaurant lost sight of the customer.  Maybe the Bar & Grill will recognize that its value proposition is not(or should not be) just all about recovering its costs.

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Upcoming Webinar: Legal Tools for Value Pricing


Particularly in difficult economic times, value pricing can be a successful means to maximize profit by pricing products and services based on their value to end-users, rather than on the supplier’s cost. Applying it necessarily means that end-users are segmented, so that some will receive better prices than others. But many companies rely on the mistaken belief that the law requires “fair and equitable” treatment of customers to create self-imposed roadblocks to effective value pricing.

Gene Zelek, an experienced pricing attorney and former marketing manager, will show how the law is fully supportive of price segmentation. He will also demonstrate how the law permits the preservation of end-user value pricing by controlling corrosive price competition among distributors, retailers and other intermediaries (including those selling over the Internet) with resale price policies and minimum advertised price (MAP) programs. Finally, Gene will discuss price signaling as a lawful way to avoid sending the wrong messages to the marketplace that jeopardize value pricing strategies.
 

This webinar will cover the following topics:

  • How the law allows account-specific pricing for effective segmentation
  • Why resale price encouragement and setting is lawful in the U.S. and Canada
  • The essential elements of legally compliant price signaling




Presented by: 
Eugene F. Zelek, Jr.
Partner and Chair, Antitrust & Trade Regulation Group
Freeborn & Peters LLP