Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Mid Market Blog – The rise of the Mid-Market Customer

Posted by: Vernon E Lennon III

Once again PPS Las Vegas was fantastic and the expenditure an investment in the future. While I found the content interesting and the community invigorating, I still felt something missing from the conference. Glancing around I noticed many presenters from large firms including; software, consulting, and operating companies. Analyzing the cross section of attendees I found the characteristics to be very much the same. While larger companies have traditionally dominated these conferences in the past for good reasons, were was the Mid-Market audience?

Now, I understand the ‘larger’ customer to be the “bread & butter” not only for PPS, but also for larger consulting firms and software providers. Have we over looked our mid-market cousins, and as such squandered some incredible opportunities? Arguably mid-market customers have a greater need for learning, consulting and potentially software services given the fact their people often “wear multiple hats”, and the majority of mid-companies lack dedicated pricing departments.

Don’t get me wrong, there was some “content” addressing mid-market customers presented at the conference in Las Vegas. In fact my presentation on “Virtual Markets” was focused on mid-market players predominantly, and I also saw some software providers showcasing “SAAS Solutions” (software as a service) that are more than appropriate for their needs.


The mid-market customer tends:

  1. …to have grown out of a “need” or innovation cycle that has led to their current size.
  2. …to focus more on operating issues than enhanced efficiencies / proficiencies and as a result likely has no budget for pricing.
  3. …to have more strained internal resources to manage price, hence has a greater “need” for pricing education, services, solutions and software.
  4. …to take more time to decide on how to manage the price lever, in order to mitigate the risk of a poor investment.
  5. …to benefit more from internalizing pricing competency through what PPS has to offer.
In short, PPS is fantastic at championing the need for pricing within companies, and I am blessed to have been a part of it for many years. I would love to see it grow to be representative of a truly domestic business mix. A few companies have started to recognize the potential here, but while these providers have great solutions it remains only the tip of the iceberg. I know the pricing community has much to share with the mid-market audience and even more to learn.

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Govt to consult on drug pricing in December

Written by: LYNNE TAYLOR
Consultation on the government’s plans to introduce value-based pricing (VBP) for medicines will begin next month, the Department of Health has announced.
The consultation will run until next March, the Department reveals in its newly-published business plan for 2011-15. The plan sets out the coalition govenrment’s structural reform priorities for health care, which are to: - create a patient-led NHS; - promote better healthcare outcomes; - revolutionise NHS accountability; - promote public health; and -reform social care.
These reforms “will help to create a world-class NHS that saves thousands more lives every year by freeing up resources to go to the front line, giving professionals power and patients choice, and maintaining the principle that healthcare should be delivered to patients on the basis of need, not their ability to pay,” says the Department.
The introduction of VBP comes under the document’s Structural Reform Plan aiming to promote better healthcare outcomes. This will involve shifting the focus and resources away from “bureaucratic process targets” and towards measures such as national health outcomes, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient experience measures.
The Plan states that development with drugmakers of a new pricing process for medicines will get underway from next April and be introduced after the current Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS) comes to an end in January 2014, Moreover, a “milestone” of the Plan will be the establishment, in April 2012, of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) “on a firmer statutory basis,” it notes.
Other actions aimed at promoting better health outcomes will be: - scrapping process targets and introducing national health outcome measures “to prioritise the health results that really matter;” - reforming Payment by Results to provide incentives for healthcare services to deliver high-quality care; devising a palliative care funding system that is responsible to the wishes of patients, “while being fair to all providers and affordable to the public purse;” and - providing support for the NHS to release up to £20 billion in efficiency savings over four years, for reinvestment across the system.
The Department also pledges to improve data transparency, which it says is an important principle and can also help to promote efficiency and drive down costs.For example, the business plan notes that “the breakdown of NHS expenditure into different disease classifications helps NHS Trusts to identify where their costs are out of line with those of the best. Making such information available will also help the public and other stakeholders to identify wasteful expenditure, further increasing efficiency.”
The document also notes that there may be gaps in information about which the Department is currently unaware. Therefore, prior to the introduction of any Right to Data legislation, requests by the public for the release of datasets can be made through the Department’s Customer Service Centre.
The business plan will be refreshed annually, and each month the Department will publish a “simple” report on its progress in meeting the commitments set out in the document, it says.

Thursday, November 10, 2011

CAN YOU CAPTURE & VALUE THE PRICE OF SPEED?: OUTSOURCING FOR DRUG DEVELOPMENT & MANUFACTURING


Article by: Michael Hurwich, Dr. Doug Treen & Tammy Power

Outsourcing drug research has become more popular, not only because of increased efficiencies in third-party core competencies, but also because numerous Pharmaceutical & Biotech companies are often challenged with conflicting budgets, dated equipment, software or knowledge that may or may not fall short of existing regulatory allowances. 

Emphasis has traditionally been placed on chemical methodologies over technological advances and process design, therefore, even if a faster process is discovered many companies do not have the capacity or budget to execute it.

What does all this mean? 

Well, since time is of the essence in drug discovery, any delay in R&D becomes a double-edged sword. Costs increase & revenue is not realized sooner. With the aforementioned challenge in mind, we conducted proprietary research with customers and non-customers to determine whether pricing for the "Speed of Service Delivery" would contribute to top line revenue. The goal of the research was to determine whether our client could price for Speed? 

This article will provide you with some food-for-thought by drawing upon research conducted with companies from Pharma, Biotech and Clinical Labs - both small & large.
Pharmaceutical and Biotech companies occasionally have conflicting budgets and agendas for lab time usage and are often not performing effectively & efficiently in an effort to identify or produce new drugs for approval and sale. One attribute third-party companies can leverage over their larger Pharma and Biotech counterparts is the ability to develop rapid-response upstream R&D and step-up manufacturing downstream. Smart companies that are outsourcing their available expertise and recent technology will capture additional value brought forth by their core competencies through price.

Capturing this incremental value through price comes into play when time is of the essence and sheer speed itself becomes a highly valued element for an organization. The question therein lies, just how valuable is it? In drug development, the answer is very valuable! When a Pharmaceutical or Biotech organization is in the development stage of their R&D process, timing is critical. The greater the number of assays that can be conducted in a uniform and systematic timely fashion, the greater the probability of hitting a winning formula that equates to a multi-million dollar success. How can a Pharma, Biotech or Clinical Lab increase the odds of discovery? Partnering with third parties to deliver specialized and available targeted developmental services can exponentially increase the odds.

 We know it's desirable for customers to seek rapid turnaround time for product development - a highly valued attribute; but is the industry willing to pay a significant premium in order to beat the competition for both FDA approval and the Patent office? Through our research, we found third-party companies can validate charging a higher price as they are providing customers with a highly valued and dedicated service in an expeditious amount of time. Speed becomes a value-added attribute and a tremendous asset to their service delivery solution. As such, companies that outsource their expertise and technology in a third-party relationship can capture value and the resulting incremental revenue by pricing according to their customer's need for rapid service in the arena of drug development and manufacturing.

SPEED IS OF THE ESSENCE - WORKING WITH THIRD-PARTIES

 In the Pharmaceutical & Biotech industry, turnaround time for new drug development is vital to their success and can be achieved by understanding:
1. 
The more assays that can be conducted and completed in the developmental stage in a narrower span of time, the greater the odds for discovering a successful formula, the quicker the results are presented to the FDA and other regulatory bodies and if approved, the quicker to market.
2. 
The cost could be reduced to develop a drug as information is banked through previous efforts at discovering a winning formula by a third-party that has obtained incremental knowledge by researching for other Pharma's or Biotechs with similar or like drug discovery.
3. 
The cost to develop a drug is an expeditious manner is far outweighed by the potential revenue realized by sooner bringing the product to market.

In an effort to quickly bring the potential drug to market sooner, many experiments must be conducted to both discover a winning formula and satisfy regulatory requirements. The industry looks to effectively maximize the amount of tests conducted in an effort to find a champion in the most efficient time span possible. The greater the number of tests completed, the faster the profitable drug can be discovered and presented for FDA approval. Outsourcing lab services is widely used at various points in the drug discovery process. Third-party companies can focus on their core competencies (including speed) in both drug development and manufacturing. Our research noted that many Pharmaceutical companies traditionally strong in drug research and development would consider outsourcing for manufacturing assistance if quality & speed could be ensured through the step-up process, whereas Biotechs may require more efficient and less expensive R&D processes at different developmental stages.

MATCHING SPEED WITH PRICE

It is important to note that a large portion of R&D costs are allocated in the initial stages of drug development, yet a return is not generated until the drug actually goes to market. The faster a patent can be obtained, coupled with the speed to market of a new drug, the faster a company can maximize profit through the utilization of optimum value-based pricing models before competitors start production of their own generic or like knock-offs. To sustain a consistent revenue stream, new products must be developed and brought to market in the most efficient manner possible in order to offset declining prices and ensuing revenues from older well-known brands that may be in the remaining years of patent protection, thereby becoming susceptible to a competitive threat from their generic counterparts offering lower-priced alternatives.

CAN I CHARGE MORE FOR SPEEDY RESULTS?

Value-based pricing revolves around knowing your customer and understanding what constitutes their decision selection criteria to achieve both your mutual goals and objectives. Capturing all that drives a customer's purchase and ensuring that you can deliver on these attributes is key towards generating incremental revenue through value-based pricing. A value tradeoff is made when incremental value is priced at the appropriate incremental rate. Simply put, customers are willing to pay a higher price for something they attach a higher value rating towards.

Pricing services based on how the value proposition is perceived by the customer is a proven method for any company to help realize corporate goals and objectives of improved market share, ROI, revenue or profitability. Through our pricing research, we found speed to be a highly valued element in the arena of drug development as companies are willing to pay above market prices if such services can be executed in a timely fashion by a third party.

Companies' outsourced services will yield greater value if they are able to offer their customers fast, consistent and reliable research at various stages throughout the drug development process. With this realization, third-party vendors can capture additional incremental value by "pricing for speed". In determining an accurate pricing formula for third-party outsourcing, one must first estimate the worth of additional value the customer places on significant time savings, and then adjust prices accordingly to share in the supplementary value presented to the customer.

In a recent study, The Foundation Group found that small and large Pharma's and Biotechs in the United States were willing to pay significant premiums for faster results. In some cases, customers were willing to pay upwards of 30% based on a 10-30% timesaving. This willingness-to-pay varied according to the type and size of the customer within the organization and industry. (See Chart of Findings, n=56) The value of pricing for speed is emphasized as even the smallest timesaving of 10% still yielded a willingness-to-pay premium of 3-10%.

PROFITABLE SEGMENTATION

Different customer segments allot varying amounts of value to the vital attribute of "speed" depending on the priority & ranking attributed to the aforementioned in a customer's decision selection criteria. The price premium attributed to the speed of drug development also depends on the type of customer, in addition to the extent to which time is of the essence in their operations. If a customer places high priority on development of a certain drug, and/or the company is less price-sensitive, they are more apt to pay above market prices in a race to evaluate & validate the experiments in the R&D process.
Customers can further be clustered into three distinct market segments: price sensitive, strategically focused and loyal. Once these markets are determined, a third-party contracted to conduct various stages of drug development can significantly improve incremental revenue.

1st Segment - Price Sensitive Segment
. These companies have a low threshold for pricing pain and place a higher priority on price over speed. For a third-party company, this segment represents the least opportunity in terms of additional revenue resulting from offering time savings.

2nd Segment - Strategically Focused Segment
. Customers are value driven. These customers will make a trade-off between price and a value-added element (e.g. speed of service), thereby justifying a price premium for service that provides them with incremental value.

3rd Segment - Loyal Segment
. A change in price will not affect their willingness-to-pay. These customers are willing to pay a higher price for an increase in value; therefore, since speed has been determined to be a valuable commodity, the greatest opportunity for a third-party vendor relationship for profitability resides within this segment. Additionally, this segment's loyalty is likely the result of a longstanding, credible relationship with a history of consistent and uniform analysis. A customer risks compromising existing test results and regulatory approvals if new tests are conducted with a new or different vendor.

The challenge and goal is to quickly evaluate and validate which companies within which industries are either price sensitive, strategically focused or loyal. Once the market and customer segments can be determined, a price-metering exercise is warranted to determine each customer's price/value tradeoff associated with the attribute of "speed".

Use segmentation to select or reject customers that place little value on "speed" through their willingness-to-pay. Price segmentation is often used to identify which group of customers is the best to serve. Although these customers are targeted, many companies cannot resist the temptation to sell their services to the whole market in a misguided attempt to grab market share. Consequently, serving the unprofitable "price-sensitive" segment at the expense of profitable customers bogs down these companies.

PRICING SPEED OF SERVICE TO THE MARKET

Third-party companies can recognize the unique advantage of "pricing for speed" and price their services, both in research and step-up manufacturing accordingly.
The goal and objective is to understand how "speed" obtained by outsourcing available capacity, expertise and technology for drug development and manufacturing services can equate to greater revenue for both parties involved. In fact, the revenue gained by being first-to-market will far exceed the cost to outsource.

In conclusion, in the Pharmaceutical and Biotech industry, the fastest possible turnaround time for a new drug launch is critical for success. Within this industry, companies clearly consider the attribute of "speed" to be of great importance, and value it accordingly based on the segmentation pattern to which they would reside. Speed to market translates into superior performance allowing Pharmaceutical and Biotech companies to gain a leg-up on competing generic counterparts by stretching short-term exposure to revenue er
osion.